Parkhill Tax Advisory Group and Mark Bianchi Facts

Parkhill Tax Advisory Group and Mark Bianchi FactsParkhill Tax Advisory Group and Mark Bianchi FactsParkhill Tax Advisory Group and Mark Bianchi Facts

Parkhill Tax Advisory Group and Mark Bianchi Facts

Parkhill Tax Advisory Group and Mark Bianchi FactsParkhill Tax Advisory Group and Mark Bianchi FactsParkhill Tax Advisory Group and Mark Bianchi Facts

Parkhill Tax Advisory Group and Mark Bianchi Facts

Parkhill Tax Advisory Group and Mark Bianchi FactsParkhill Tax Advisory Group and Mark Bianchi FactsParkhill Tax Advisory Group and Mark Bianchi Facts

What Court Filings, Public Records, and Due Diligence Reveal

This page summarizes publicly documented legal disputes, financial records, and business filings related to Mark Edward Bianchi and entities he has controlled or promoted, including Parkhill Capital Group, Parkhill Advisory Group, and Titan Capital Recovery Group. The information below is drawn from court filings, regulatory records, and a comprehensive third-party due diligence report prepared in October 2024.


No findings of liability are asserted here. The purpose of this page is to present facts that potential investors may wish to review before engaging in transactions or advisory relationships.

A Pattern of Litigation and Court Judgments

Court records across multiple jurisdictions show repeated lawsuits involving unpaid obligations, contract disputes, and family law enforcement actions.

Key findings include:


  • Multiple default judgments entered against Bianchi for unpaid rent and contractual obligations in California courts.
     
  • A 2009 breach-of-contract lawsuit by a CPA firm resulting in a default judgment after Bianchi failed to respond.
     
  • American Express lawsuits in 2016 and 2018 that were dismissed without prejudice after service attempts failed, with court notes indicating vacant property addresses.
     
  • Ongoing family law disputes dating back to 2005, including allegations in 2024 filings that Bianchi still owed approximately $4 million in past-due equalization payments and child support.
     
  • A January 2021 judgment of $1.79 million entered against Bianchi related to divorce proceedings, including court findings that his conduct frustrated settlement efforts and increased litigation costs.
     

These matters remain visible in public dockets and have not been fully resolved as of the report date.

Alleged Fraudulent Tax & Security Activity Summary

Download PDF

Who Is Mark Bianchi?

Mark Edward Bianchi is a California-born executive who currently identifies himself as CEO of Parkhill Capital Group. Over the past two decades, Bianchi has been associated with numerous entities in media, insurance, tax planning, and financial consulting.


Public biographies and promotional materials describe him as a tax planning and investment professional. However, court records and regulatory filings paint a more complicated picture that includes extensive litigation, unresolved judgments, dissolved entities, and significant tax liens.


Extensive Tax Liens While Promoting Tax Expertise

One of the most striking findings for potential investors involves the contradiction between Bianchi’s marketing as a tax planning expert and his personal tax history.

Public records show:


  • Multiple federal and state tax liens, many in the six-figure range.
     
  • Liens spanning multiple jurisdictions, including California, New York, Florida, and Tennessee.
     
  • Tax years dating back more than a decade, with several liens recorded for unpaid federal income taxes.
     
  • Some liens later released, while others show no recorded release at the time of review.
     

For investors evaluating tax-driven strategies or charitable structures, unresolved or repeated tax enforcement actions against a promoter are commonly viewed as a material risk indicator.


Parkhill, Titan, and Entity Instability

Bianchi has operated under multiple business names, several of which show administrative dissolution, inactivity, or unclear legal standing.

Examples include:


  • Parkhill Advisory Group Inc., incorporated in Tennessee in 2023 and administratively dissolved in 2024.
     
  • Parkhill Energy Group Inc., also dissolved administratively in Tennessee.
     
  • Titan Capital Recovery Group LLC, formed in Florida in 2018 and voluntarily dissolved in 2023 with filings stating the entity was “not profitable.”
     
  • A 2021 New York lawsuit filed on behalf of “Titan Capital Recovery Group LLC” despite no record of that entity being registered in New York, raising questions about entity representation.
     

Investors typically view inconsistent entity status, dissolved corporations, and unclear operating structures as red flags when evaluating counterparties.

Mark Bianchi Due Diligence File

Download PDF

Marketing Claims and Copied Success Stories

The due-diligence report documents that client success stories promoted on Bianchi’s websites were copied nearly verbatim from a separate, publicly traded company in the life-settlement space.


The stories were presented in a way that could reasonably give prospective clients the impression they reflected Titan or Parkhill-specific outcomes. This practice raises concerns about misleading marketing representations, especially in regulated financial or tax-sensitive contexts.

Head Genetics and the Theranos Parallel

According to the report and related litigation, Bianchi and associated entities promoted Head Genetics, a company that made ambitious claims about proprietary technology and investment opportunities with charitable components.


Solidaris Capital, after reviewing Head Genetics, reportedly declined to proceed due to red flags uncovered during due diligence. Head Genetics is now a defendant in civil litigation involving fraud allegations, contested valuations, and disputed representations.


The pattern is familiar to investors who lived through Theranos:


  • Sophisticated marketing.
     
  • Complex technical claims few outsiders could independently verify.
     
  • Promoters and intermediaries amplifying the story.
     
  • Lawsuits and scrutiny emerging only after capital was committed.
     

Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes was once celebrated as a visionary and received major awards before the company collapsed under investigative scrutiny. History shows that early promotional enthusiasm can blind intermediaries and reporters to warning signs that later become obvious.

Why These Details Matter to Investors

Taken together, the records raise questions that prudent investors typically ask before proceeding:


  • Are the entities properly formed, active, and compliant?
     
  • Do promoters have unresolved financial or tax enforcement issues?
     
  • Are marketing claims independently verifiable?
     
  • Have similar structures or partners already resulted in litigation?
     
  • Is there a pattern of dissolution, rebranding, or shifting entities?
     

Investors evaluating Parkhill-related opportunities may wish to review these public records carefully and seek independent legal and financial advice.

Sources and Documentation

This page is based on court filings, regulatory records, and the Mark Bianchi Due Diligence Report (October 2024) prepared by a third-party investigator. No conclusions of liability are asserted. All matters described are alleged, pending, or based on public records.


Copyright © 2025 Parkhill US and Mark Bianchi Facts - All Rights Reserved.

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept