This page summarizes publicly documented legal disputes, financial records, and business filings related to Mark Bianchi and entities he has controlled or promoted, including Parkhill Capital Group, Parkhill Advisory Group, and Titan Capital Recovery Group. The information below is derived from court filings, regulatory records, and an extensive third-party due diligence report prepared in October 2024.
No findings of liability are asserted here. The purpose of this page is to present facts that potential investors may wish to review, particularly regarding financial consulting and tax liens, before engaging in transactions or advisory relationships.
Court filings across multiple jurisdictions reveal a history of lawsuits involving unpaid obligations, contract disputes, and enforcement actions in family law concerning Mark Bianchi. Key findings include:
- Multiple default judgments entered against Bianchi for unpaid rent and contractual obligations in California courts.
- A 2009 breach-of-contract lawsuit by a CPA firm, which resulted in a default judgment after Bianchi failed to respond.
- Lawsuits from American Express in 2016 and 2018 that were dismissed without prejudice after service attempts failed, with court notes indicating vacant property addresses associated with Parkhill Capital Group.
- Ongoing family law disputes dating back to 2005, including recent allegations in 2024 filings that Bianchi still owed approximately $4 million in past-due equalization payments and child support.
- A January 2021 judgment of $1.79 million entered against Bianchi related to divorce proceedings, where court findings noted that his conduct frustrated settlement efforts and increased litigation costs.
These financial consulting matters remain visible in public dockets and have not been fully resolved as of the report date, raising concerns about potential tax liens.
Mark Bianchi, a California-born executive, currently serves as the CEO of Parkhill Capital Group. Over the last two decades, Bianchi has been involved with various organizations in media, insurance, tax planning, and financial consulting. Public biographies and promotional materials often highlight his expertise as a tax planning and investment professional. However, court filings reveal a more complex narrative, including extensive litigation, unresolved judgments, dissolved entities, and significant tax liens.
One of the most striking findings for potential investors involves the contradiction between Mark Bianchi's marketing as a tax planning expert and his personal tax history. Public records, including various court filings, reveal: multiple federal and state tax liens, many in the six-figure range; liens spanning multiple jurisdictions, including California, New York, Florida, and Tennessee; tax years dating back more than a decade, with several liens recorded for unpaid federal income taxes; and some liens later released, while others show no recorded release at the time of review. For investors evaluating tax-driven strategies or charitable structures through financial consulting, unresolved or repeated tax enforcement actions against a promoter like Bianchi of Parkhill Capital Group are commonly viewed as a material risk indicator.
Bianchi, known for operating under various business names, has several entities with records of administrative dissolution, inactivity, or unclear legal standings. Examples of these include: Parkhill Advisory Group Inc., which was incorporated in Tennessee in 2023 but was administratively dissolved by 2024. Another entity, Parkhill Energy Group Inc., also faced administrative dissolution in Tennessee. Additionally, Titan Capital Recovery Group LLC was established in Florida in 2018 and voluntarily dissolved in 2023, with court filings indicating that the entity was 'not profitable.' A notable 2021 lawsuit in New York was filed on behalf of 'Titan Capital Recovery Group LLC,' even though there is no record of this entity being registered in New York, raising concerns about entity representation. Investors often perceive inconsistent entity statuses, dissolved corporations, and unclear operating structures as significant red flags when assessing counterparties, particularly in the context of financial consulting, as seen with Mark Bianchi's associations with Parkhill Capital Group and potential tax liens.
The due-diligence report documents that client success stories promoted on Mark Bianchi’s websites were copied nearly verbatim from a separate, publicly traded company in the life-settlement space. The stories were presented in a way that could reasonably give prospective clients the impression they reflected outcomes specific to Titan or Parkhill Capital Group. This practice raises concerns about misleading marketing representations, especially in regulated financial consulting contexts or when addressing issues related to tax liens.
According to court filings and related litigation, Mark Bianchi and associated entities promoted Head Genetics, a company that made ambitious claims about proprietary technology and investment opportunities with charitable components. Parkhill Capital Group, after reviewing Head Genetics, reportedly declined to proceed due to red flags uncovered during due diligence, including issues related to tax liens. Head Genetics is now a defendant in civil litigation involving fraud allegations, contested valuations, and disputed representations.
The pattern is familiar to investors who lived through the Theranos saga:
Sophisticated marketing.
Complex technical claims few outsiders could independently verify.
Promoters and intermediaries amplifying the story.
Lawsuits and scrutiny emerging only after capital was committed.
Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes was once celebrated as a visionary and received major awards before the company collapsed under investigative scrutiny. History shows that early promotional enthusiasm can blind intermediaries and reporters to warning signs that later become obvious.
Taken together, the court filings raise questions that prudent investors typically ask before proceeding:
Are the entities involved with Parkhill Capital Group properly formed, active, and compliant?
Do promoters, such as Mark Bianchi, have unresolved financial or tax enforcement issues, including tax liens?
Are the marketing claims made by these entities independently verifiable?
Have similar structures or partners already resulted in litigation?
Is there a pattern of dissolution, rebranding, or shifting entities?
Investors evaluating Parkhill-related opportunities may wish to review these public records carefully and seek independent financial consulting and legal advice.
Copyright © 2025 Parkhill US and Mark Bianchi Facts - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.